Hall of Fame NFL quarterback Warren Moon denies harassment claim

(Reuters) – Professional Football Hall of Status quarterback Warren Moon denied accusations of sexual harassment by using a woman who used to be an executive assistant to the former National Football League participant on the Sports Advertising agency he co-founded.

FILE PHOTO: Former NFL player Warren Moon arrives on the Twenty Seventh Anniversary Sports Outstanding benefiting Cedars-Sinai Scientific Genetics Institute on the Hyatt Regency Century Plaza in la, California Could 20, 2012. REUTERS/Bret Hartman

In Line With the lawsuit filed Monday in Advanced Court in Orange County, California, Moon required Wendy Haskell to share his bed all through work journeys, wear lingerie and made undesirable sexual advances while she worked as his executive assistant at Sports 1 Advertising.

Reuters used to be not independently in a position to confirm the allegations.

“Warren Moon has but to be served with the lawsuit filed by means of Wendy Haskell, but he’s aware of the claims contained in it. Mr. Moon denies the claims by way of Ms. Haskell,” his lawyer, Daniel Fears, stated in a commentary got via Reuters Thursday dated December 6.

“Mr. Moon contends these claims are meritless, and he has each intention to vigorously protect himself in Court.”

A consultant from Moon’s company did not straight away respond to Reuters when asked to comment on the allegations towards the Sixty One-yr-previous former quarterback.

In Step With the lawsuit, Haskell used to be employed by means of Sports 1 Advertising in early July to be Moon’s executive assistant, and her tasks integrated touring with him for speaking engagements, charity occasions and personal appearances.

The lawsuit claims that Haskell traveled with Moon on a virtually weekly foundation right through her employment and that he made her stay in his lodge room and share his mattress.

Haskell alleges she used to be required to maintain the toilet door unlocked when she showered and that Moon many times entered the room. She additionally claims that Moon grabbed her crotch while she was once drowsing and slipped a drug into her drink right through a travel to Mexico in October as a result of he idea she was no longer “having enjoyable.”

The lawsuit additionally claims Haskell said Moon’s conduct to the company’s chief govt, David Meltzer, in October but they did not look at her claims. Haskell also says she was demoted after making the complaints. She is still employed through the company.

Moon, who played professionally in Canada ahead of happening to superstar in the NFL, is the co-founder and president of the Irvine, California-primarily based firm, which used to be also named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

”Wendy Haskell made the decision to proper a giant unsuitable,“ her legal professional, Diana Fitzgerald, advised Reuters late Wednesday in a phone interview from Miami. ”She now joins a rising staff of valiant ladies who’ve decided primarily sufficient is sufficient.

“Right Now we are experiencing an extraordinarily highly effective movement in our usa as we’re witnessing a primary technology of women who are not going to take it anymore.”

The NFL’s Seattle Seahawks, where the previous quarterback played for two years, said in an e mail observation late Wednesday it had usual Moon’s request for a depart of absence as the membership’s radio analyst.

After winning 5 consecutive championships in the Canadian Soccer League, Moon moved on to the NFL for a 17-yr occupation that incorporated stints with the Houston Oilers, Minnesota Vikings, Seahawks and Kansas Metropolis Chiefs.

Regardless Of spending his first six Skilled seasons within the CFL, Moon was once 0.33 all-time in NFL passing yardage and fourth in landing passes on the time of his retirement in 2001. Five years later he was the primary black quarterback to gain induction into the professional Soccer Hall of Reputation.

Reporting by way of Frank Pingue in Toronto; Modifying with the aid of Jacqueline Wong and Alden Bentley

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Comments are closed.